In the context of FWPs/CWPs, which method is appropriate for making minor administrative changes?

The appropriate method for making minor administrative changes in the context of FWPs (Field Work Plans) or CWPs (Contract Work Plans) is pen and ink. This approach is commonly used in documentation processes where minor adjustments need to be made without creating a new document or formally revising it. The use of pen and ink allows for a clear visibility of changes while maintaining the integrity of the original document. It also ensures that the adjustments are easily recognizable to anyone reviewing the document, which is important for maintaining clear communication and documentation standards.

Voiding is typically a method used to completely nullify a document, which is not suitable for minor changes. Attachment refers to adding additional documents or information, which may not directly address the need for simple edits. Pencil marking is often discouraged for official documents as it can be erased or altered easily, leading to ambiguity regarding the authenticity and permanence of the changes made. Therefore, pen and ink stands out as the most appropriate and professional way to document minor administrative modifications effectively.